To your economic concerns, yes, Universal healthcare. As to your question about me being a father figure, yes again, I will be a priest, so I will be a father figure to the community.

Also, please be kinder, you’re aggression detracts from your ethos.

That’s a very good question! And here’s another one. If we find that research would require the death of a person then would that research be ethical? We would probably agree that harming or killing a person, even if it’s for research would be unethical. That’s what we as a society decided after the Tuskegee experiments, that the rights of an individual cannot be tarnished for the sake of another, or even for greater society.

Therefore, how could one argue for the legitimacy of abortion on the grounds that the woman’s ‘choice’ trumps the rights of the unborn person? It’s agreed that killing is not an acceptable way to advance the cause of another. Therefore, abortion is unethical.

No,

1.  because it is not fertilized.

2.  because murder requires premeditation.  One does not menstruate with premeditation.

Right, but up to a certain point, which you pointed out beautifully. 

If you’re dying of kidney failure and I say I will donate my kidney, I can go back on my word at any moment until the kidney has been transplanted in your body.

You would not be able to get your kidney back once it is in my body.  Even if you were to have kidney failure and need a kidney.  Why?  Because kidney donation is a gift and once a gift is given it cannot be taken back, especially a gift so vital as a kidney which represents life in this life or death situation. Similarly once the child is conceived, one cannot take back the gift of life given to the child for one’s own sake.  It would be like asking for your kidney back from someone who would die without it, and that is a ‘dick’ thing to do.

Well, thank you!  To your question, Life itself began once, 3.5 billion years ago or so.  Every one of us can trace our DNA back to that one primordial event.  (Okay, possibly not because of polygenesis, the theory that life began in several different places at different times but ignoring that.)

Anyways, each human life begins at conception.  I know this because at the moment of conception an organism is created from two separate organisms.  This organism has human DNA and if allowed to grow, will eventually be able to reproduce with any other member of the human species.  Before conception, you had two separate cells, the sperm and egg, and neither of them have the full human DNA, nor would they be able develop in anyway possible to reproduce with any member of our species.

Abortion is still killing a person.  You can’t claim its a personal choice as if that means anything.  You realize that you could change abortion with any heinous crime, and the argument you make would be just as valid? (or rather, invalid.)

Prochoice is pro-abortion because you seek to legalize abortion.  In the same way that those who wanted slavery to be legal were pro-slavery. 

Actually, morally and legally you are obligated to do so if the alternative is killing a human being.

Consent cannot be revoked to endanger the lives of other people. 

You are right, you can use medication to eliminate the infection, because that medication is not killing another human being.

Abortion is murder and God does love you as much as me.  All people are created equal.  That does not mean that all political opinions are created equal.